翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Bank Resalat Kerman FSC
・ Bank reserves
・ Bank Respublika
・ Bank Restriction Act 1797
・ Bank Road
・ Bank Robber (film)
・ Bank robbery
・ Bank roll
・ Bank run
・ Bank Saderat Iran
・ Bank of New South Wales Building
・ Bank of New South Wales Building, Gympie
・ Bank of New South Wales v Commonwealth
・ Bank of New South Wales, Helidon
・ Bank of New York
Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corp.
・ Bank of New Zealand
・ Bank of New Zealand Building
・ Bank of New Zealand building, Wellington
・ Bank of New Zealand v Greenwood
・ Bank of Newark Building
・ Bank of Ningbo
・ Bank of Nolensville
・ Bank of North America
・ Bank of North Carolina
・ Bank of North Dakota
・ Bank of Oberlin
・ Bank of Oklahoma Plaza
・ Bank of Onslow and Jacksonville Masonic Temple
・ Bank of Osceola


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corp. : ウィキペディア英語版
Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corp.

''Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corporation'', 2008 WL 5259732, is a case that was decided in Delaware's Court of Chancery in 2008.〔Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corporation, 2008 WL 5259732 (Del. Ch. Unpublished Memorandum Opinion)〕 The court held that a company's proposed debt exchange offer was not permissible under the terms of the documents governing the company's debt. The case is frequently referenced in banking law and is used in several law school case books.〔Stephen M. Bainbridge, Klein, Ramseyer, ''Business Associations'', 8th Ed. (Foundation Press), 871.〕
==Facts==
Realogy Corporation had several outstanding debts and sought to refinance many of its debt notes by offering to exchange the notes for term loans under a new $500 million term loan facility. The new term loans would be issued under the credit facility and would be secured by a second lien on almost all of Realogy's assets.
Because the new term loans were to be secured by second liens under the credit facility, the proposed exchange offer would have allowed the "Senior Fixed Notes" to effectively become senior to the "Senior Toggle Notes" and the "Senior Subordinated Notes" to "leapfrog" in priority over the Senior Toggle Notes.
The trustee under the indenture sued Realogy on behalf of holders of the Senior Toggle Notes, arguing that the exchange offer breached the indenture.〔Stephen M. Bainbridge, Klein, Ramseyer, ''Business Associations'', 8th Ed. (Foundation Press), 871.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corp.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.